<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bipartisanship is Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billpressshow.com/2010/01/21/bipartisanship-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billpressshow.com/2010/01/21/bipartisanship-is-dead/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR. Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.billpressshow.com/2010/01/21/bipartisanship-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>DR. Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billpressshow.com/?p=1674#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>I agree that little in the way of bipartisanship has been offered by the Dem&#039;s. The trip to meet with the Republicans was nothing more then a chance to say &quot;I won, that trumps you&quot;. So much for &quot;the One&quot; and his bipartisanship. Remember the House rules change to accommodate the minority party when the Dem&#039;s lost control? Seems when old Nancy got in charge, that was the first thing to go.  The minority party only needs rule changes when its name begins with a D, not an R. So if your looking for a little cooperation, lets start with something that doesn&#039;t involve an earmark, kickback, bribe, favor for selected groups, donors or special interests.  One other point worth mentioning. Why parade Bill Clinton as the author of the balanced budget. The Repub&#039;s led both houses at the time and ol Bill fought them tooth and nail to prevent this. (Oh, that right, Repub&#039;s never deserve any credit, they are the party of no.) Grow up kids, time for the adults.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that little in the way of bipartisanship has been offered by the Dem&#8217;s. The trip to meet with the Republicans was nothing more then a chance to say &#8220;I won, that trumps you&#8221;. So much for &#8220;the One&#8221; and his bipartisanship. Remember the House rules change to accommodate the minority party when the Dem&#8217;s lost control? Seems when old Nancy got in charge, that was the first thing to go.  The minority party only needs rule changes when its name begins with a D, not an R. So if your looking for a little cooperation, lets start with something that doesn&#8217;t involve an earmark, kickback, bribe, favor for selected groups, donors or special interests.  One other point worth mentioning. Why parade Bill Clinton as the author of the balanced budget. The Repub&#8217;s led both houses at the time and ol Bill fought them tooth and nail to prevent this. (Oh, that right, Repub&#8217;s never deserve any credit, they are the party of no.) Grow up kids, time for the adults.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.billpressshow.com/2010/01/21/bipartisanship-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1602</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billpressshow.com/?p=1674#comment-1602</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I can agree with you on this one.  While on the surface it appears that Repubs are being obstructionist, it can be argued that the reason they are is that they have limited input in the process.  Whether true or not, there is a definite appearance of the Republican Party being frozen out of any serious discussions concerning key legislation... to the point where they have actually been locked out of the room while discussions have taken place.

Can you seriously make a case that the Democrats are reaching across the aisle to Republicans while such shenanigans are going on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I can agree with you on this one.  While on the surface it appears that Repubs are being obstructionist, it can be argued that the reason they are is that they have limited input in the process.  Whether true or not, there is a definite appearance of the Republican Party being frozen out of any serious discussions concerning key legislation&#8230; to the point where they have actually been locked out of the room while discussions have taken place.</p>
<p>Can you seriously make a case that the Democrats are reaching across the aisle to Republicans while such shenanigans are going on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Bipartisanship is Dead -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.billpressshow.com/2010/01/21/bipartisanship-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Bipartisanship is Dead -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billpressshow.com/?p=1674#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gregory Morales, Bill Press. Bill Press said: Today&#039;s Parting Shot - Bipartisanship is Dead http://bit.ly/4pLv7Y [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gregory Morales, Bill Press. Bill Press said: Today&#39;s Parting Shot &#8211; Bipartisanship is Dead <a href="http://bit.ly/4pLv7Y" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4pLv7Y</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

