There Was Never Any IRS Scandal After All

When is a scandal not a scandal? Here’s a good rule: Whenever Fox News and Rep. Darrell Issa say it IS a scandal, you can be pretty sure it’s NOT one. Take the so-called IRS scandal.

For weeks, starting in May, Fox fanned the flames. Based on what we now know to be a flawed audit by Inspector General J. Russell George, Fox reported that the IRS had deliberately targeted right-wing groups seeking tax-exempt status. According to breathless Fox News anchors, the IRS first singled out conservative organizations by drawing up a “Be on the Lookout,” or BOLO, list using keywords like “patriot” and “Tea Party.” Then they picked on those same organizations by asking them for tons of irrelevant information and dragging their applications out for months. And, if you can believe Fox News, all of this was carried out by the IRS on direct orders from the Obama White House.

Meanwhile, Issa, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, has held four congressional hearings so far, accusing the IRS of conducting a Tea Party witch hunt. In typical Issa fashion, he ratcheted the rhetoric up even higher, tying the IRS to the White House and comparing President Obama to Richard Nixon. Issa said on “CBS This Morning”: “This was targeting of the president’s political enemies, effectively, and lies about it during the election year so that it wasn’t discovered until afterwards. … This process was deliberate, and it was repeated.”

Shamefully, most of the mainstream media merely echoed charges made by Fox and Issa, leaving the American people with the impression of a giant Washington scandal where Democrats were using government bureaucrats to crucify Republicans. But now the truth comes out: It was all one big fat lie.

Independent investigations by both Yahoo News and Politico reveal that the IRS, in fact, investigated both conservative and liberal groups applying for tax-exempt status. And, indeed, it’s important that the IRS do so. The law clearly states that only organizations devoted to “social welfare” can receive a coveted tax exemption because we taxpayers should not be subsidizing any purely political groups on the right or left. IRS officials were merely trying to enforce the law, perhaps clumsily, when faced with a flood of new political organizations filing for tax-exempt status after the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in January 2010.

By far, most of the applicants were conservative groups. But Yahoo and Politico discovered that the IRS applied the same rules to both right-wing and left-wing applicants. Inspector General George was wrong. They didn’t just draw up a BOLO list with keywords like “patriot” for conservatives. They drew up a BOLO list for liberals with key words like “progressive,” “occupy,” medical marijuana,” and “Israel.” They looked at organizations on both the left and right. They asked both sides for extensive documentation to demonstrate they were, indeed, social welfare organizations. And, in the end, there was only one group actually denied tax-exempt status because it was set up “primarily for the benefit of a political party.” That was not a Tea Party group. It was the unabashedly liberal group Emerge America.

As for Issa’s claim that IRS staffers were politically motivated and merely following orders from the White House, there is zero evidence to support it. At one hearing, Issa repeatedly pressed IRS veterans Elizabeth Hofacre and Carter Hull on whether they knew of any political motivation by people inside the IRS or any influence from outside the IRS to target conservative organizations. They said “no.” In its lead editorial on July 18, USA Today questioned why Issa persisted with his investigation: “No political operatives from the Obama campaign or the White House have been linked to any of the IRS’ activities.”

So why was there such a fuss over IRS scrutiny of conservative groups? Two reasons. First, as noted, because Inspector General George’s initial report itself was, at best, one-sided. Second, because liberal groups didn’t complain as loudly, or, in most cases, didn’t complain at all. They understood that getting tax-exempt status should not be automatic. “If you’re going to ask for exceptional treatment, you should expect to go through exceptional screening,” Ed Espinoza, executive director of the liberal organization Progress Texas, told Politico. But conservatives whined louder and got all the attention.

Conservative witch hunt? In the end, it boils down to this: The IRS was only doing its job. There was no scandal.

14 Responses to There Was Never Any IRS Scandal After All

  1. Scott says:

    You are lying in more spectacular fashion than you have ever done before. While there was apparently some edict that liberal groups were supposed to receive extra scrutiny, they never got the proctological exam that the Tea Party groups got. These groups were asked what kind of prayers they uttered, whether or not they were planning on conducting acts of civil disobedience, and they were even told to reveal how much money they got from donors. That is a huge no-no. The IRS never went to this extent with liberal groups.

    Fox News was right once again. There absolutely was (and still is) is a scandal here. The fact that you are just parroting the marching orders you received is utterly transparent. Oh well, in just a month, the Qatari gas pimps will soon be assuming full control of Current, and your TV show will be history.

    Tick…tick…tick…

  2. Hammer says:

    When is a scandal really a scandal? Whenever liars like Press, Carney and Missy tell us to “move along, nothing to see here”.
    Here is a warning the Libs better understand. The behavior you endorse now may be used against you when your corrupt dictator is no longer in office. Maybe the Libs just aren’t smart enough to grasp that concept. This will be verified when missy weighs in with her koolaid and hormonally imbalanced half witted response.

  3. brewster says:

    Agreed Scott & Hammer. When Bill Press says nothing to see here, He is lying his @ss off (at least more so than usual). If liberal groups are soooo smart and all, how come they support and listen to an @sshat like Bill press?

  4. jeffg says:

    Obama and Carney suddenly start spouting ‘phony scandals’ and oddly enough bill writes a ‘parting ‘shot’ supporting them. I wonder how much the administration is paying him to be lap dog?

  5. jeffg says:

    LMAO!!
    “Meanwhile, ain’t politics fun? By the end of the year, New Yorkers might boast Mayor Anthony Weiner and Comptroller Eliot Spitzer. Both are great politicians and both remind us that we’re all human and we all make mistakes.”..Bill Press July 12, 2013

    “Weiner must go!”…Bill Press July 25, 2013

    Enough said?

  6. brewster says:

    The admin would never pay Billy for his devotion. It’s like a cult, Billy gives everything he has to the anointed one and they ‘praise’ Billy in return. For one day Billy will be invited onto the space ship that will carry the anointed one and his followers to nirvana.

  7. Emile says:

    Darryl Issa must go.

  8. jeffg says:

    obombem must go.

  9. Hammer says:

    See what I mean…. I should have also included “chimp like” in my description of Missy’s response.

  10. Kali says:

    Amazing how the Republicans are fond of comparing Obama to Richard Nixon (a Republican) only when they can claim that Obama is worse. Isn’t that the same as acknowledging that Nixon committed crimes that today’s Republicans would applaud if Obama was not president?

  11. Jeffg says:

    Kind of like what the Dems are doing now?

  12. Hammer says:

    Oh great another no information voter.I would never compare Obama to Nixon. Nixon was classy enough to resign. While dear leader goes into campaign mode and claims he know nothing about it and says he is going to launch an investigation (which is usually investigated by the people who they are investigating) then tries to change the subject.
    Now lets stay on topic and leave your Nixon distraction for a time when it’s relevant.

  13. Jeff says:

    Kali is probably right though Hammer. No one should compare Obama to Nixon. I think this would be more fair comparison:
    http://www.youtube.com/embed/34ag4nkSh7Q?autoplay=1

  14. kwms says:

    When I read the title to this article, I thought it was a joke. So as I was reading it, I kept waiting for the punch line and, dang, if he wasn’t serious! I guess Bill is getting different information on this than the rest of us. If you ask me, it’s time for the IRS to go. An organization with this kind of authority is just asking for corruption. And as they take on Obamacare, it’s just going to get worse, not better.

Leave a reply